Printable Version (PDF)
Here is a tentative agenda for the 2011 CMAS Conference. Each speaker is alloted 15 minutes for their oral presentation and 5 minutes for questions. We will strictly enforce these time allotments, so that we have time to accommodate everyone on the schedule. *Times listed below are subject to change.
| October 24, 2011 - Grumman Auditorium |
| 7:30 AM | Registration and Continental Breakfast |
| 8:00 AM | A/V Upload for Oral Presenters |
| 8:30 AM | Opening Remarks: Dr. Bruce Carney, Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost, UNC |
| 8:40 AM | Keynote Address: Dr. Kevin Teichman, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science, US EPA |
| 8:55 AM | CMAS Update Dr. Adel Hanna, Director, CMAS |
| |
Air Quality Modeling Science |
| 9:10 AM |
Overview of New Features in CMAQv5.0
Jonathan E. Pleim, Shawn J. Roselle, Rohit Mathur, Jeffery Young, Prakash Bhave, Heather Simon, Deborah Luecken, Bill Hutzell, Golam Sarwar, John Streicher, David Wong, Havala Pye, Kathleen Fahey, Rob Gilliam, George Pouliot
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, NERL, USEPA, Research Triangle Park, NC
A new version of the Community Mutiscale Air Quality model (CMAQv5.0) is scheduled for release to the public in October 2011. The new version includes science updates and code restructuring. In addition, an option to run the WRF-CMAQ as a 2-way coupled model is included. This presentation will outline the new features of CMAQv5.0 and introduce the other presentations describing these model upgrades in more detail.
The aerosol module was redesigned to eliminate dependencies and duplication across modules. The speciation of PMOther was improved by adding 9 new PM2.5 species, including primary non-carbon organic matter (NCOM), and particulate Fe, Al, Si, Ti, Ca, Mg, K and Mn. An oxidative aging reaction was added for primary organic aerosol. There were some minor updates to the SOA yield parameterization. A new aerosol thermodynamics module was included (ISORROPIAv2). An optional algorithm for windblown dust was added.
The Carbon Bond (version 05) chemical mechanism (CB05) now includes updated the toluene chemistry, revised rate constants for N2O5 hydrolysis based on the latest recommendation of IUPAC, and additional reactions of toluene and xylene with chlorine radical. A new version of the SAPRC mechanism (SAPRC07TB & TC) was integrated into CMAQ, and includes fully updated organic and inorganic reactions, updated photolysis rates, operator species to better represent chemical reactions in low-NOx conditions, explicit treatment of additional species with high emission, high toxicity, or high SOA formation, and an updated isoprene mechanism.
The inline photolysis rate module was improved to increase flexibility by reading input data from an ASCII file (created by a pre-processor) for easy modification/introduction of associated data (e.g., quantum yield, cross section) for new reactions, and an algorithm is now included that calculates the surface albedo based on land use categories, zenith angle, seasonal vegetation, snow and sea ice coverage.
A new option was introduced to add production of nitrogen oxide (NO) from lightning. This algorithm allows users to incorporate lightning NO by either reading an offline 4-D file, computing inline informed by lightning detection network data, and a fully inline option.
A new technique for computing vertical velocity and vertical advection that eliminates excessive diffusion in the upper model layers has been developed. Also, a new stable boundary layer scheme has been applied to both WRF and CMAQ.
Other structural updates were also included to improve the flexibility of the CMAQ code. A namelist option was included to eliminate the numerous include files, which allows users to make some changes to the model species treatment at runtime.
Jon Pleim
|
| 9:30 AM |
Rohit Mathur
|
| 9:50 AM |
Jesse Bash
|
| 10:10 AM |
S.T. Rao
|
| 10:30 AM |
Break |
| | Special Session on Air Quality Modeling Applications in memory of Daewon Byun, Chaired by: Rick Saylor and Pius Lee (NOAA) |
| 11:00 AM | Tribute to Dr. Daewon Byun
Rick Saylor (NOAA), Pius Lee (NOAA), Adel Hanna (CMAS), and Ken Schere (US EPA) |
| 11:30 AM |
Andrea Fraser
|
| 11:50 AM |
Mike Moran
|
| 12:10 PM |
Seiji Sugata
|
| 12:30 PM |
Lunch, Trillium Room |
| 1:30 PM |
Jeff McQueen
|
| 1:50 PM |
Ivanka Stajner
|
| 2:10 PM |
Christian Hogrefe
|
| 2:30 PM |
Yongtao Hu
|
| 2:50 PM |
Break |
| 3:20 PM |
Inclusion of wildfires in North and Central America as exo-CONUS-domain intermittent sources for NAQFC: an operational feasibility study
Pius Lee1*,Fantine Ngan2, Hyuncheol Kim3, Daniel Tong3,Yunhee Kim3, Tianfeng Chai3, Yunsoo Choi3, Rick Saylor8, Ariel Stein3,
Youhua Tang4, Jianping Huang4, Jeff McQueen5,Marina Tsidulko4,Hochun Huang4,Sarah Lu4,
Ken Carey6, Ivanka Stajner6,and Paula Davidson7
Corresponding Author Address: Pius Lee,
1 NOAA/OAR/ARL, 1315 East West Hwy, Room 3461, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
2 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO.
3Earth Resources & Technology ,Inc, Annapolis Junction, MD
4 I.M. Systems Group, Inc. Rockville, MD 20852.
5 NOAA/NWS/National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, MD.
6 Noblis, Inc., Falls Church, VA.
7 Office of Science and Technology, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, MD.
8NOAA/OAR/ARL, 456 S. Illinois Ave, Oak Ridge, TN 37830
The National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC) currently provides 48-hour surface ozone concentration forecasts for the conterminous (CONUS) 48 states. One of the considerable challenges for the NAQFC is future quantitative forecasts of the concentration of particulate matter (PM) smaller or equal to 2.5 µm aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5). The highly variable spatial and temporal distribution of PM2.5 together with its complex combination of chemical composition, mixing states, coatings of organics, and characteristics of origination pose challenges to predict its mass, speciation, and distribution over space and time. An equally considerable challenge is the potential lowering of the US EPA ozone standards. There is evidence that long-range transport has caused the background concentration of ozone to the CONUS domain to increase in recent decades. Capturing real-time concentrations of the various constituents in the inflowing air mass to the domain will be even more critical to accurately forecast ozone concentrations under the lower standards. To address both of these challenges we focus on wildfires in this study. Wildfires are a significant source of primary PM2.5 and ozone precursors. It has been reported that PM2.5 emitted during large fires can remain in the atmosphere for multiple days and be transported long distances. Therefore, PM2.5 forecasting should include the best available real-time emission information on intra- and- exo- domain wildfires. By the same token, precursor emissions from wildfires would help ozone forecasting. This study is an attempt to quantify possible improvement of forecasts for both ozone and PM2.5 by including the exo-domain fires. A large North American CMAQ parent domain was created to facilitate the generation of dynamic boundary conditions for the CONUS domain. The parent domain ingests near real-time fire information within its geographical coverage but outside of the CONUS domain. Results of this nested run will be compared to that without nesting to delineate its impact. Both ground-based and airborne measurements will be used to quantify the fidelity of the forecast for early summer 2010, when numerous fires occurred in North and Central America but outside CONUS.
Pius lee
|
| 3:40 PM |
Fong Ngan
|
| 4:00 PM |
Eun-Su Yang
|
| 4:20 PM | Poster Session
Air Pollution Meteorology
Fang-Yi Cheng -
Timothy Glotfelty -
Neil Wheeler -
Air Quality Measurements and Observational Studies
Otón M. Grimolizzi -
The Tucuman Solar UV Transparency Experiment
Otón M. Grimolizzi1, 2, Benítez, L. M.1, Frenzel de Llomparte, A.M.1, 2
1Laboratorio de Estudios de Baja Atmósfera (LEBA) - Instituto de Riesgo Geológico y Sistematización Territorial (IRGIST) Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Miguel Lillo 205, Tucumán, Argentina
2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
Mail to: grimolizzi@aol.com
Two solar UV radiometers were built and simultaneously operated during the past dry season in Tucumán province, NW Argentina. Ampimpa, an astronomic observatory in the mountains was adopted as a reference, non polluted monitoring site, while, the INTA (National Institute for Agricultural Technology) meteorological facilities at Famaillá, in the plains was chosen as an air pollution test site, its sets of data to compare to those from Ampimpa.
The quotient of simultaneous radiometry data between the reference site, and the polluted site, was very close to unity in clear days. In cloudy, misty, smoked or rainy days this quotient does not hold, a fact that is reflected by loss of statistical significance in statistical tests performed on corresponding data sets.
By making use of the special geographic characteristics of the region, it was possible to estimate particulate matter (PM) content by taking air samples and relating them to radiometry data. Also some results of a 2006 short term campaign using sun photometers are displayed together with particulate matter content determination.
Keywords: radiometer, ANOVA, transmittance, particulate matter.
Hyun Cheol Kim -
Evaluation of fire modeling systems: fire smoke extension and chemical composition
Hyun Cheol Kim1, Ariel Stein1, Yunhee Kim1, Pius Lee2, Fong Ngan3, Tianfeng Chai1, Rick Saylor2, Youhua Tang4, Jeff McQueen5, Chuanyu Xu6, Shoba Kondragunta6, Roland Draxler2, Tara Strand7, Sim Larkin7, and Ivanka Stajner8
1 ERT on assignment to NOAA/ARL, Silver Spring, MD
2NOAA/ARL, Silver Spring, MD
3UCAR on assignment to NOAA/ARL, Silver Spring, MD
4SAIC on assignment to NOAA/NCEP, Camp Spring, MD
5NOAA/NCEP, Camp Springs, MD
6NOAA/NESDIS, Camp Springs MD
7Pacific Northwest Research Station, US Forest Service
8Noblis, Inc., Falls Church, VA
Emissions from forest fires and prescribed burns play a significant role in regional air quality significantly contributing to the increase in particulate matter (PM) concentrations over the US. Simulating the impact from fire emissions, however, is challenging due to high uncertainties in many processes, including the detection of the fire location and time duration and the determination of the emission injection heights. In this study, we have compared outputs from two fire forecasting systems with various observations to evaluate the models’ ability to simulate physical extent of the fire smoke plume along with a quantitative verification of its chemical composition. The first one is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Smoke Forecasting System (SFS) system. This system utilizes the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model for calculating the transport, dispersion and deposition of smoke driven by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) North American Model (NAM) meteorological model, the Hazard Mapping System (HMS) for fire detection, and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service (FS) BlueSky framework for estimating the emissions.The second modeling system analyzed uses the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. Observations from various sources are selected to separate the signal originating from fire emissions. From surface observations, we have utilized total PM and speciation data (e.g. Organic carbon (OC) and Elemental carbon (EC)) from AirNOW and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air Quality System (AQS). Visual imagery of fire smoke analysis from HMS have been used to evaluate the horizontal transport of the simulated fires. Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) measurements from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) have also been compared.
M. Makarova -
Air Quality Modeling Applications
Tianfeng Chai -
Yunsoo Choi -
Use of a satellite-based indicator of ozone production sensitivities to diagnose model bias
Yunsoo Choi1,2, Rick Saylor3, Ariel Stein1,2, Pius Lee1, Hyuncheol Kim1,2, Yunhee Kim1,2, Fantine Ngan4, Youhua Tang5, Jeff McQueen6, Ivanka Stajner7
1NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD
2Earth Resources Laboratory, Inc
3NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division, Oak Ridge, TN
4University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
5Scientific Applications International Corporation, Camp Springs, MD
6NOAA/NWS/National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Spring, MD
7Noblis, Inc., Falls Church, VA
Simulation results from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 4.7 over the Conterminous United States (CONUS) for August 2009 are analyzed to evaluate the variation of the hourly-averaged ground-level ozone (O3) at stations classified according to their O3-NOx-VOC chemical sensitivity regimes. The O3 sensitivity regimes (NOx-saturated/mixed/NOx-sensitive) are inferred from the values of photochemical indicators based on the HCHO to NO2 ratio of column data obtained from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment 2 (GOME-2) and model. When compared to the U. S. EPAs Air Quality System (AQS) observations, the CMAQ model overpredicts hourly-averaged O3 concentrations over the photochemical indicator based regimes (NOx-saturated: +5.4%; mixed: +22.1%, and NOx-sensitive: +29.9%) with high correlation coefficients of R>0.92. Compared with the base CMAQ run, a 30% NOx emissions reduction reduces the high O3 biases over the NOx-sensitive regime by 8.7% and a 30% VOC reduction in the model reduces the O3 biases over the NOx-saturated regime by 7.2%, implying that possible chemical or physical mechanisms to reduce NOx over the NOx-sensitive regime or to reduce VOC over the NOx-saturated regime are not well represented in the model. Results from sensitivity studies to further explore the causes of these O3 biases will be presented.
Jia-Yeong (Michael) Ku -
Jianping Huang -
The impact of change in land use and land cover characterizationon air quality forecasting
Jianping, Huang1,2*, Jeff McQueen2, Brad Ferrier1,2, Youhua Tang1,2, Marina Tsidulko1,2, Ho-chun Huang1,2, Sarah Lu1,2, Bill Lapenta2, Geoff DiMego2, Michael Ek2, Pius Lee3, and Ivanka Stajner4,5
*Corresponding Author: Jianping Huang, NCEP/EMC, IMSG, 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD 20746-4304; jianping.huang@noaa.gov
1I.M. Systems Group Inc., Rockville, MD
2NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, MD
3NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD
4Noblis Inc., Falls Church, VA
5Office of Science and Technology, NOAA/National Weather Service, Silver Spring, MD
Land use and land cover (LULC) characteristics impact air quality forecasting through their effects on surface-atmosphere interactions, emissions, and dry deposition velocities. NOAAs operational air quality prediction is planned to start using the National Environmental Modeling System (NEMS) Non-hydrostatic Multi-scale Model on the Arakawa staggered B-grid (NMM-B) coupled with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system in the summer of 2011. One of the notable changes in the system is that the NMM-B uses the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) instead of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) LULC data that were used by the previous version of operational air quality predictions. The IGBP LULC utilized by NMM-B contains a more recent characterization of land use, which is based on the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) land cover science data product. In this study, several sensitivity experiments are conducted with NMM-B/CMAQ to investigate the impact of IGBP LULC on prediction of meteorological variables and chemical species for the continental US (CONUS) during August 2011. We examine the differences in several meteorological fields important for air quality prediction including surface radiation, sensible and latent heat fluxes, and the planetary boundary layer height (PBLH). The impact of LULC data on biogenic emissions that are used within CMAQ is evaluated. CMAQ predictions of several key chemical species, including surface ozone and PM2.5, are compared when different LULC data are used. The predictions are compared with AIRNow observational data and the results are verified using the NCEP Forecasting Verification System (FVS). Finally, we discuss possible modifications to the coupling of NMM-B with CMAQ to improve the use of IGBP LULC.
Yunhee Kim -
Investigating Seasonal Biases of NAQFC PM2.5 Concentrations
Yunhee Kim1, Rick Saylor2, Yunsoo Choi1, Tianfeng Chai1, Hyun-Cheol Kim1,
Daniel Tong1, Pius Lee3 , Marina Tsidulko4 ,and Jeff McQueen5
1Earth Resources & Technology, on assignment to NOAA’s Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD
2NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division, Oak Ridge, TN
3NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD
4I.M. Systems Group, Inc. Rockville, MD 20852
5NOAA/NWS/National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, MD
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC) developmental version utilizes the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to forecast ground-level PM2.5 total mass concentrations over the conterminous U. S. (CONUS) domain. Currently, the PM2.5 concentrations generated by CMAQ are overpredicted from September through April and underpredicted from June through August. In an effort to better understand the causes of these seasonal biases, a detailed comparison of total mass and speciated PM2.5 measurements from several networks with modeled concentrations has been conducted for two periods in CY2009. The goal of these comparisons is to gain insight into specific CMAQ model processes or inputs that are deficient and in need of improvement to reduce the observed seasonal biases.
PM2.5 mass and speciation data for January and August 2009 from the Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization (SEARCH) study network and the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) network as well as PM2.5 mass concentrations from the U. S. EPA AIRNow network have been compared against both CMAQ 4.6 and 4.7.1 model predictions at the network locations. Results of these analyses clearly indicate particular emission inputs and processes that need to be improved to lessen the observed seasonal biases. The overall approach and results of these analyses will be presented and discussed. Additionally, results from preliminary retrospective CMAQ simulations for January and August 2009 will be presented to demonstrate proposed modifications to the modeling system to improve its PM2.5 forecasting capabilities.
Hyun Cheol Kim -
IDL-based Geospatial Data Processor (IGDP): A new spatial allocator
Hyun Cheol Kim 1,2, Daewon W. Byun1, Clint Harper3, Fong Ngan1,4, Daniel Tong1,2, Pius Lee1, and Ivanka Stajner5
1NOAA/ARL, Silver Spring, MD
2ERT, Laurel, MD
3UCAR, Boulder CO
4TCEQ, Austin TX
5Noblis, Inc., Falls Church, VA
A new tool for fine resolution geospatial data processing has been developed. Fast and accurate Geographic Information System (GIS) data processing tools are essential in air quality studies; especially in preparing model emission inputs as finer resolution air quality simulations become more commonplace. An IDL-based Geospatial Data Processor (IGDP), written in Interactive Data Language (IDL by ITT Visual Information Solutions), has been created and can process GIS data both in vector format (e.g. ESRI shapefiles) and raster format (e.g. GEOTIFF and IMG) for any given domain. Processing speeds have been improved through the use of polygon-clipping routines and other algorithms optimized for particular applications. The raster tool utilizes a histogram reverse-indexing method, which enables easy access of grouped pixels, so it can generate statistics of pixel values within each grid cells, with improved speed and enhanced control of memory usage. IGDP supports map projection conversions between Lambert Conformal Conic (LCC), Rotated latitude-longitude (RLL, used in National Centers for Environmental Protection (NCEP) North American Model (NAM)), geographic latitude-longitude coordinates, and also is capable of easy expansion to all 40 projections that IDL supports.
The basic role of IGDP is to generate emission surrogate files, but numerous other applications are possible, including re-gridding of emission data, satellite data processing, ocean/land file processing, and Land Use Land Cover (LULC) data processing. Examples of applications will be presented, including typically encountered errors when using inappropriate map projection information. We have tested the tool with high-resolution grid settings and high-resolution data, such as 1 km CONUS domain (columns = 5200 and rows = 3200) and 30-m National Land Cover Data (NLCD) data (161190 x 104424 pixels).
Chris Misenis -
Youhua Tang -
Long-range Transport of Dust in NAM/CMAQ Predictions using GFS-GOCART Lateral Boundary Conditions
Youhua Tang1,2 (youhua.tang@noaa.gov), Jeffery T. McQueen2 (jeff.mcqueen@noaa.gov), Sarah Lu1,2 (sarah.lu@noaa.gov), Ho-Chun Huang1,2 (ho-chun.huang@noaa.gov), Marina Tsidulko1,2 (Marina.Tsidulko@noaa.gov), Jianping Huang1,2 (jianping.huang@noaa.gov), Pius Lee3 (pius.lee@noaa.gov), Ivanka Stajner4 (Ivanka.Stajner@noaa.gov)
1. I.M. Systems Group Inc., Camp Springs, MD 20746, USA
2. Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction, 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD 20746, USA
3. NOAA Air Resource Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD
4. Noblis Inc, Falls Church, VA
The Global Forecast System-Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport (GFS-GOCART) global aerosol model is running in inline and offline modes to predict mineral dust. The inline GFS-GOCART has the dust emission, advection, diffusion and removal processes on GFSs native grid (T126) at the time step of 450 seconds while the offline GFS-GOCART used interpolated GFS meteorology to drive a stand-alone GOCART model in 1 degree resolution. These two systems use different advection schemes and parameterizations of moist convective processes. The National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC) modeling system is running at NOAA/NWS/NCEP. Developmental testing of NAQFC predictions of fine aerosols relies on the North American Model NAM (WRF-NMM) meteorological model coupled to the CMAQ V4.6 model (CB5 gas phase and AERO-IV aerosol chemistry with fugitive dust emissions only) to produce 48-hour air quality predictions over the Continental U.S. We use the NAQFC system and GFS-GOCART provided lateral boundary conditions (LBCs) to study long-range transport of dust over the continental USA. In the summer of 2010, a dust layer that originated in the Sahara desert was transported across the Atlantic to reach the Southeastern USA in the lower troposphere. Surface AIRNOW PM data are used to evaluate the performance of developmental NAQFC aerosol predictions and compare the impacts of LBCs from the offline and inline GFS-GOCART models.
Marina Tsidulko -
IMPACT OF METEOROLOGY ON AIR QUALITY PREDICTIONS IN THE NOAA FORECAST SYSTEM
M. Tsidulko1,2, J. McQueen2, G. DiMego2, M. Ek2, B. Ferrier1,2, Y. Tang1,2, J. Huang1,2, P. Lee3, I. Stajner4,5
1 I.M. Systems Group Inc., Rockville, MD
2 NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Environmental Modeling Center, Camp Springs, MD
3 NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD
4 Noblis Inc., Falls Church, VA
5 Office of Science and Technology, NOAA/National Weather Service, Silver Spring, MD
The configuration of the NOAA Air Quality Forecast System targeted for implementation in the summer of 2011 consists of newly developed NOAA Environmental Modeling System (NEMS)/NMMB (B-grid version of the Nonhydrostatic Multiscale Model) and Community Model for Air Quality (CMAQ). Several significant episodes of AQ forecasts are analyzed to determine impacts of different meteorological parameters predicted by NMMB on ozone forecast. Temperature, wind, humidity, cloud cover and other parameters are analyzed and verified with observational data. Boundary layer depths as a key parameter in air quality modeling determining extent of turbulence and dispersion for pollutants are examined and related to ozone forecasts provided by CMAQ. Verification of PBL depth with aircraft observations (ACARS) is provided. PBLs both from NMMB and CMAQ models are considered. The study emphasizes comparison between meteorological parameters from 12 km resolution full-domain NMMB forecast and 4 km resolution Continental US (CONUS) nest forecast - which is proposed as meteorological input for future higher resolution AQ predictions.
Nan Zhang -
Forecasting O3 and PM2.5 during 2009-2011 Summer and Winter with WRF/Chem-MADRID over the Southeastern United States
Nan Zhang, Yaosheng Chen, and Yang Zhang
Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
In this study, the Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF/Chem) with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization, and Dissolution is employed for RT-AQF over the southeastern U.S. during three ozone (O3) seasons (May to September of 2009 - 2011) and two winters (December 2009 to February 2010 and December 2010 to February 2011). The objectives of this study are to evaluate the models forecasting skill and to identify possible causes of biases for model improvement.
The forecasting skill is evaluated against several observational datasets. The predicted meteorological variables such as temperature and relative humidity at 2 m, wind speed and direction at 10 m, and precipitation are compared with several datasets including the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), the Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization (SEARCH), the Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET), the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP), and the Speciation Trends Network (STN). The predictions of O3 are compared with observations from AIRNow, the Aerometric Information Retrieval SystemAir Quality Subsystem (AIRSAQS), CASTNET, SEARCH, and those of PM2.5 and PM species are compared with observations from AIRNow, STN, SEARCH, CASTNET, and the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE). The evaluation includes discrete statistics, categorical indices, spatial distribution, and temporal variation on various scales such as hourly, daily, monthly, and seasonally.
Discrete evaluations show that in O3 season the model slightly overpredicts maximum 1-hr and 8-hr average O3 mixing ratios in 2009 but slightly underpredicts them in 2010. It slightly underpredicts 24-hr average PM2.5 concentrations in both O3 seasons. In winter, the model slightly underpredicts maximum 1-hr and 8-hr average O3 mixing ratios and 24-hr average PM2.5 concentrations. Categorical evaluations show that the accuracy values for maximum 1-hr and 8-hr O3 mixing ratios and 24-hr average PM2.5 concentrations are 94.0-100.0%, 84.3-99.5%, and 71.2-85.1%, respectively, indicating an overall good accuracy of predicting exceedances and nonexceedances. The critical success index (CSI) values are 14.1-22.7% for maximum 8-hr average O3 in O3 seasons and 22.2-24.3% and 21.8-49.9% for 24-hr average PM2.5 in seasons and winter, respectively.. Seasonal-mean probability of detection (POD) values are 30.0 and 33.3% for maximum 8-hr average O3 in O3 seasons and 31.2% and 32.9%, and 37.9% and 27.7% for 24-hr average PM2.5 in O3 seasons and winter, respectively. Seasonal-mean Bias (B) shows model overpredictions or underpredictions that are consistent with discrete evaluations, with the least biases of 1.03 to 1.24 for PM2.5 predictions in 2009/2010 winter. The False Alarm Ratio (FAR) values are 33.5 - 57.4% for maximum 8-hr average O3 in O3 seasons and 34.2-74.7% and 59.1-74.9% for PM2.5 in O3 season and winter seasons, respectively. Site-specific evaluations show that the model captures most O3 mixing ratios and PM2.5 concentrations as compared to observations during 2009 and 2010. The biases of forecasted O3 and PM2.5 are within ±10 ppb and ±6 µg m-3 for most simulated days at the 6 urban sites. Evaluations and sensitivity simulations will be conducted to identify possible causes of model biases (which may include the uncertainties of boundary conditions and inaccuracies of meteorological predictions).
Air Quality and Climate Change
Farhan Akhtar -
Meridith M. Fry -
Shu Xu -
Emissions Inventories, Models, and Processes
Z. Adelman -
Taciana T. de A. Albuquerque -
PM2.5 Mass Response to Precursor Emissions Reductions over Sao Paulo State, Brazil.
Taciana T. de A. Albuquerquea , J. Jason Westb, Rita Yuri Ynouec, Maria de Fátima Andradec
a Environmental Engineering Department/ Federal University of Espírito Santo. albuquerque.taciana@gmail.com
b Environmental Sciences & Engineering / University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
c Atmospheric Sciences Department/ University of São Paulo.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the response of PM2.5 concentrations to changes in precursor gases and primary particles emissions. The Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System (CMAQ) was used to investigate the spatial and temporal variability of the efficacy of emissions control strategies in São Paulo State, Brazil. Meteorological fields were modeled using the Weather Research and Forecasting model WRFv3.1, for the 10-day period (10 - 21 Aug, 2008) and after the SMOKE emissions model was applied to build a spatially and temporally resolved vehicular emissions inventory for a high resolution domain of 3-km (109 x 76 cells). Seven different scenarios were simulated considering the current emission inventory, called base case, a future scenario considering a reduction of 50% of SO2 emissions (Case 2), a scenario considering no SO2 emissions (Case 3), a reduction of 50% of SO2, NOx and NH3 emissions (Case 4), a scenario considering no sulfate (PSO4) and nitrate (PNO3) primary particles emissions (Case 5), another considering only excluding the PSO4 emissions (Case 6) and the last one considering no PNO3 emissions (Case 7). To compare all the numerical results over the whole domain, it was considered the average of PM2.5 for each case during the entire period of study, after that, it was made the difference between each hypothetical case and the base case. It was also observed the temporal evolution of PM2.5 concentrations at nine grid points (Surface Local Stations). The main results showed that reductions only in SO2 emissions are likely to be less effective than expected at reducing PM2.5 concentrations at many locations of São Paulo State. Case 2 presented an average, a decrease of 3 mg/m3 on PM2.5 concentrations, but in some areas there were an increase of 1.2 mg/m3. Evaluating the ammonia gas availability between the base case and case 2, it was verified an increase of its concentrations in the south area of the grid, and Nitric Acid showed a decrease of its concentrations. This result could indicate that nitric acid may was transferred to the aerosol phase through the reaction with ammonia gas, originating nitrate aerosol. Case 3 was irrelevant, showing only a decrease of 0.3 mg/m3 in whole area. Case 4 showed the largest PM2.5 reduction for entire domain, not showing an increase of the PM2.5 concentration, in average. In case 5, at all stations, was verified a decrease of PM2.5 average concentrations. However, there are some places of the grid showing an increase of PM2.5 concentrations, which varies from 0.3 to 1.2 mg/m3, as also observed in case 2. Case 6 showed the same results that were observed on case 5. Case 7 did not show a significant result, presenting a small increase for the entire domain (0.3 mg/m3). This result may indicate that reductions in sulfate concentration may cause inorganic fine particle matter (PM2.5) to respond nonlinearly, as nitric acid gas may transfer to the aerosol phase. The spatial and temporal distribution of concentration varies in the whole domain. In conclusion, the largest reduction in PM2.5 was obtained when occurred a reduction of 50% of SO2, NOx and NH3 emissions, considering the average at one point (surface stations) or the average over the whole domain. We suggest that the role of secondary organic aerosols and of Black Carbon particles need to be considered when making policy decisions to control the PM2.5 concentrations because together they represent around 70% of the PM2.5 mass concentration in São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlie Coats -
David Mobley -
Alexis Zubrow -
Model Development
Jared Bowden -
Robert W. Pinder -
Havala Pye -
Golam Sarwar -
Heather Simon -
Simulating Primary Organic Mass and Organic Carbon in CMAQ
Heather Simon, Prakash V. Bhave
Organic mass (OM) is a major component of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), but it is the most difficult to represent in numerical air quality models. To accurately simulate ambient OM concentrations, one must represent both organic carbon (OC) and non-carbon organic mass (NCOM). To date, these two aerosol components have been distinguished in very few models. In this study, we add primary emissions of NCOM to the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model by assigning source-specific OM/OC ratios to the primary OC estimates from the National Emissions Inventory: 1.7 for biomass combustion, 1.25 for automobile exhaust, and 1.4 for other sources. We estimate 600,000 tons/year of NCOM emissions from the U.S. alone, which is 12% of the national PM2.5 inventory (Reff et al., 2009). After OC and NCOM emissions are injected into the photochemical model, we simulate oxidative aging of the primary OM which produces secondary NCOM. This oxidative aging is simulated as a second order reaction between primary organic carbon (OCpri) and OH radicals.
Recently, we devised a method for estimating the spatial and seasonal distributions of NCOM from Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) measurements across the U.S. (Simon et al., 2011). When compared against these field data, the standard CMAQ model systematically underestimates summertime OM/OC ratios and grossly underestimates the spatial and temporal variability of NCOM. In this poster, we evaluate OM/OC ratios from our new model formulation against those derived from ambient measurements. The effects of (i) using source-specific OM/OC ratios during emission processing, and (ii) treating the oxidative aging of primary OM in the atmosphere, are evaluated separately and in combination for two month-long simulations (January 2002 and July 2002). The new model treatment allows for better estimates of seasonal and regional trends in OM/OC ratios.
Reff, A., Bhave, P., Simon, H., Pace, T., Pouliot, G, Mobley, D., Houyoux, M. Emissions Inventory of PM2.5 Trace Elements across the United States. Environmental Science and Technology, 2009; 43(15): 5790-5796
Simon, H., Bhave, P.V., Swall, J.L., Frank, N.H. Determining the Seasonal Variability in OM/OC Ratios across the United States Using Multiple Regression. 2011, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11, 2933-2949
Che-Kai Yeh -
Amir Hakami -
Model Evaluation and Analysis
K. Wyat Appel -
M. Barna -
A. Chtcherbakov -
Beata Czader -
George Delic -
Antara Digar -
Chuen-Meei Gan -
James Godowitch -
Syuichi Itahashi -
James T Kelly -
James T Kelly -
Daegyun Lee -
Peng Liu -
Yongqiang Liu -
Yu Morino -
Robert Nissen -
Stephen Reid -
Golam Sarwar -
Huy N.Q. Tran -
Kazuyo Yamaji -
Policy and Decision Support
Armin Aulinger -
Jaemeen Baek -
Elizabeth Blayney -
Shannon Capps -
Quantifying Relative Contributions of Aerosol Precursor Emissions to PM2.5: First Applications of ANSORROPIA in the GEOS-Chem Adjoint
Shannon Capps, Daven Henze, Armistead Russell, and Athanasios Nenes
Aerosols affect climate and are associated with degradation of human health; therefore, effective emissions control scenarios must address aerosols and aerosol precursor gases. The regulation of particles with diameters less than 2.5 micrometers (i.e., PM2.5) brings this challenge to the forefront of State Implementation Plan development. A significant fraction of this dry, fine mode aerosol mass is made up of inorganic species including SO4=, NO3-, and NH4+. Secondary inorganic aerosol formation is described in chemical transport models (CTMs) by thermodynamic equilibrium models. The resulting nonlinear relationships between aerosol precursor emissions, such as SO2, NOx, and NH3, and inorganic aerosol concentrations confound emissions control decision-making. Receptor-oriented sensitivity analysis provides a scientific-basis for decision-making by efficiently elucidating relative impacts of a variety of sources on a particular location with spatial, sectoral, and temporal resolution.
The GEOS-Chem adjoint has been employed to reveal receptor-oriented sensitivities of inorganic components of PM2.5 in selected, densely populated areas of the U.S. to aerosol precursor emissions sources both regionally and throughout the world. Specifically, the sensitivities derived from a previously implemented adjoint of an adapted MARS-A equilibrium thermodynamic model1,2are compared with those from the first implementation of the adjoint of ISORROPIA (ANISORROPIA) in a CTM adjoint. Additionally, the adjoint is used to quantify which emissions sectors lead to inorganic aerosol concentrations that would likely cause exceedance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for PM2.5 in different seasons.
1. Henze, D., Hakami, A. & Seinfeld, J. Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 24132433 (2007).
2. Henze, D., Seinfeld, J. & Shindell, D. Inverse modeling and mapping US air quality influences of inorganic PM2.5 precursor emissions using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 58775903 (2009).
Xin Qiu -
Adam Reff -
Raquel Silva -
Chris Werner -
Regulatory Modeling and SIP Applications
Jeff Lundgren -
|
| October 25, 2011 |
| | Grumman Auditorium |
Redbud Room |
| 7:30 AM | Registration and Continental Breakfast |
| 8:00 AM | A/V Upload for Oral Presenters | A/V Upload for Oral Presenters |
| |
Model Development, Chaired by Will Vizuete (UNC) and Jon Pleim (US EPA) |
Emissions Inventories, Models, and Processes, Chaired by Alison Eyth (US EPA) |
| 8:30 AM |
Rob Gilliam
|
Alison Eyth
|
| 8:50 AM |
David Wong
|
Heather Simon
|
| 9:10 AM |
Interactions of aerosols and gases with clouds and precipitation in the online-coupled regional chemistry transport model COSMO-ART
Christoph Knote(1,2), Dominik Brunner(1,2)
1) Laboratory for Air Pollution / Env. Technology, Empa - Materials Science and Technology, Duebendorf, Switzerland
2) C2SM, Center for Climate Systems Modeling, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland
Wet scavenging is a major sink for atmospheric trace gases and aerosols. However, this process is not only a sink, but also a transformation procedure (e.g. processing of aerosols in clouds), and can even represent a source (e.g. production of sulphate by aqueous-phase oxidation of SO2). Chemistry transport models sometimes represent this process only as a sink, or assume independent columns in their parameterizations. With the advent of kilometre-scale modeling it becomes clear that several assumptions made are not applicable anymore: evaporation and condensation processes in clouds need to be considered explicitly. Precipitation has to be treated as prognostic quantity, with horizontal transport across column borders and the possibility to evaporate before reaching ground. Wet scavenging parameterizations also need to account for that.
In our presentation we give an overview of the development of a comprehensive wet scavenging scheme for the online-coupled regional chemistry transport model COSMO-ART (Vogel et al., 2009, ACP), recently developed KIT-Karlsruhe (Germany). This modeling system is based on state-of-the-art components and is comparable to WRF/Chem. However, a detailed wet scavenging scheme has been missing. We have coupled the MESSY submodel SCAV (Tost et al., 2006, ACP) to COSMO-ART. This scheme features an explicit description of the transfer processes between gas- / aerosol-phase and cloud droplets / rain. A comprehensive aqueous-phase chemistry mechanism based on MECCA (Sander et al., ACP, 2005) is included via KPP, allowing for easy modifications. We have extended the SCAV scheme by an explicit consideration of the condensation and evaporation of cloud droplets in a manner consistent with COSMO microphysics. Furthermore, the chemical composition of rain drops is now also consistent with the treatment of rain in the meteorological part, allowing for 3D transport and evaporation. We will briefly outline our adaptations, then show results from idealized 2D flow over hill simulations for evaluation purposes and finally present the impact of the new coupling on realistic 3D simulations over the European domain.
References:
Sander, R. Kerkweg, A., Jöckel, P., Lelieveld, J. (2005). Technical note: The new comprehensive atmospheric chemistry module MECCA. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, pp. 445-450.
Tost, H., Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Sander, R., Lelieveld, J. (2006). Technical note: A new comprehensive SCAVenging submodel for global atmospheric chemistry modelling. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, pp. 565-574.
Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Bäumer, D., Bangert, M., Lundgren, K., Rinke, R., Stanelle, T. (2009). The comprehensive model system COSMO-ART Radiative impact of aerosols on the state of the atmosphere on the regional scale. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, pp. 8661-8680.
Christoph Knote
|
Modeling emission trends for scenarios of the future using MARKAL
Dan Loughlin, Farhan Akhtar, Bill Benjey, Chris Nolte and Rob Pinder
U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development
Daven Henze
University of Colorado
The MARKet ALlocation (MARKAL) model is an energy system optimization model. The U.S. EPA has developed a database that allows MARKAL to be applied to examine alternative energy scenarios for the U.S. through 2055. The database covers the resource supply, electricity production, industrial, residential, commercial, and transportation sectors. It includes characterizations of current and future energy demands and energy-related technologies. MARKAL uses this information to select the technology and fuel pathways that meet energy demands at least cost. At the same time, the model tracks a wide range of pollutant emissions, including NOx, SO2, PM2.5, PM10, CO, CO2, CH4, N2O, BC and OC. MARKAL also allows constraints can be applied to one or more of these pollutants and accounts for the emission constraints in selecting an optimal pathway.
The primary goal of this presentation is to introduce the MARKAL modeling framework as a tool for developing long-term emission projections. We also briefly describe two applications of MARKAL, providing a flavor of how the model is being used in ongoing research activities.
In the first application, the Global Change Air Quality Assessment, MARKAL is being used to investigate the challenges that will be faced in managing future air quality. Alternative future scenarios are being modeled, providing a set of long-range emission projections. These scenarios, which extend from 2005 through 2055, can incorporate different assumptions about population growth and migration, economic growth and transformation, energy resources, land use, climate change, technology development, and air quality, climate and energy policies. MARKAL emission outputs are converted into regional- and technology-specific emission growth factors and used within the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernal Emission (SMOKE) model to produce a future-year inventory. Air quality implications are then evaluated using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model.
The second MARKAL application is within the GLIMPSE project (GLIMPSE stands for GEOS-Chem/LIDORT adjoint radiative transfer model Integrated with MARKAL for the Purpose of Scenario Exploration). In this project, MARKAL is being used to explore multi-pollutant control strategies that simultaneously address criteria pollutants, greenhouse gases, and regional impacts of short-lived climate forcers such as black and organic carbon and sulfate aerosol. This framework is being used to examine tradeoffs and synergies related to various air quality and climate goals. For example, we are identifying which technology pathways for climate change mitigation also provide major health co-benefits.
Dan Loughlin
|
| 9:30 AM |
Shaocai Yu
|
Dale Allen
|
| 9:50 AM |
Break |
Break |
| 10:20 AM |
Greg Yarwood
|
Ellen Cooter
|
| 10:40 AM |
Aika Yano
|
Gill-Ran Jeong
|
| 11:00 AM |
Matthew Woody
|
George Pouliot
|
| 11:20 AM |
Jaemeen Baek
|
Gas and Fine Particle Species Emissions from Prescribed Burning in Managed Forests of the South-Eastern United States
Karsten Baumann1, Jamie Schauer2, Don Blake3, Steve Mitchell4, Mike Fort1, Eric Edgerton5
1Atmospheric Research & Analysis, Inc., 1000 Perimeter Park Dr, Ste G, Morrisville, NC 27560
2Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin, 660 N Park St, Madison, WI 53706
3Dept of Chemistry, University of California, 570 Rowland Hall, Irvine, CA 92697-2025
4Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708
5Atmospheric Research & Analysis, Inc., 410 Midenhall Way, Cary, NC 27513
Mechanical thinning of the forest understory prior to Prescribed Burning (PB) is believed to be an effective management practice to reduce wild fire risk and restore long-leaf pine savannas in the fire-dependent forest ecosystems of the South-Eastern United States. As part of the DoD-sponsored Defense Coastal/Estuarine Research Program, in situ measurements of PB emissions from the combustion of pine dominated forest understory were conducted in conjunction with detailed before/after fuel inventory surveys, yielding actual fuel consumption. Innovative mobile aerosol composition monitors were employed to measure and distinguish emissions from untreated (control) fuels with mechanically thinned (hydro-axed) fuels. Measured compounds include reactive gases (NH3, HONO, HNO3, HCl, SO2, light organic acids) and particle phase organic compounds (POC), water-soluble ionic species, organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC), and total PM2.5 mass. More than 100 POC species, including key molecular markers were quantified and over 40 non-methane hydrocarbon (NMHC) species measured, including certain aromatics and biogenics that are important PM precursors. Metallic and mineral emission components were determined via energy dispersive Xray fluorescence and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The measured emissions are being related to ecosystem-specific parameters describing the forest fuel types and conditions of the investigated forest areas. Applying the carbon mass balance, emission factors (EF in g or mg species per kg biomass burnt) were calculated for the suite of aerosol species measured. Preliminary results indicate that more of the available material is being consumed when the fuel is hydro-axed. Furthermore, particulate species emissions from drier fuels are systematically higher than for wetter fuels, with dry hydro-axed fuel causing the highest EF for almost all PM species. OC is the dominant PM2.5 constituent in emissions from all investigated fuels, followed by EC, nitrate, potassium, and chlorine. Emissions of PM precursors like ammonia, aromatics (esp. benzene and toluene), and biogenic organic compounds (±-pinene and isoprene) are significant. EF values from this study are compared with corresponding data published by the Emission Factor and Inventory Group in the U. S. Environmental Protection Agencys Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (AP-42, Fifth Edition, Vol. I (13): Miscellaneous Sources, 13.1 Wildfires and prescribed burning, Suppl. B, October, 1996). For PM2.5, EF values from dry fuel compare well with AP-42, while wetter fuels generate systematically lower EF values (less than half) for both treated and untreated fuels. Both carbon monoxide and methane EF values are less than a third of the corresponding AP-42 levels, with treated fuels producing generally less emissions per mass fuel burned. The same trend exists for NMHC, except that control fuel EF are within 10 % of the AP-42 levels.
Karsten Baumann
|
| 11:40 AM |
Yongtao Hu
|
Fernando Garcia-Menendez
|
| 12:00 PM |
Prakash Bhave
|
William Koshak
|
| 12:20 PM |
Lunch |
Lunch |
| |
Model Development, cont. |
Air Quality Measurements and Observational Studies, Chaired by Ken Pickering (NASA) |
| 1:20 PM |
Yunseok Im
|
Ann Marie Carlton
|
| 1:40 PM |
W. T. Hutzell
|
Greg Osterman
|
| 2:00 PM |
Jesse O. Bash
|
Jerry Gorline
|
| 2:20 PM |
Air Pollution Retention within a Complex of Urban Street Canyons: A Two-City Comparison
J. Richmond-Bryant1, A. Reff2
1National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, B243-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 USA
2Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Drive, C304-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 USA
Uncharacterized microscale spatial and temporal variability in urban air pollutant concentration dynamics may potentially contribute uncertainty or bias to epidemiological model results. In this study, methods for quantifying this variability are explored by treating urban buildings as a matrix of bluff bodies to determine the retention of air pollution in their wakes, which are bounded by the street canyons. This method was based primarily on bluff body theory that derived a functional relationship between nondimensional contaminant residence time (H) within a wake and the following fluid properties of the air: 1) Reynolds Number (Re), 2) street canyon height (D) to width (W) aspect ratio (D/W), and 3) turbulence intensity, defined as the square root of turbulence kinetic energy (k) divided by the freestream wind speed (U). H is given by the characteristic time of exponential concentration decay in a bluff body wake nondimensionalized by D and U. Empirical relationships were built from sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) concentration and meteorological data collected during the Midtown Manhattan 2005 (MID05) Study held in August, 2005 in Manhattan, NY, along with geographical information system (GIS) data describing the building topography. Results were then compared with results from a similar previous analysis using data collected during the Joint Urban 2003 (JU2003) study in Oklahoma City, OK.
For the MID05 data, Re ranged from 1.65x106 to 7.74x107, with a median of 1.13x107. The range of Re was consistent with earlier observations from the JU2003 study, although the measured winds tended to be more turbulent (median k = 2.2 m2s-2) compared with JU2003 (median k = 0.45 m2s-2). Values for H ranged from 7.2 to 1186, with a median of 80.9. The distribution of H was substantially wider for MID05 than for JU2003, with values exceeding observations of H by an order of magnitude for single obstacle wind tunnel studies with Re ~ 104. Inverse relationships were validated between H and Re and between H and D/W for the MID05 data and for a pooled data analysis from the MID05 and JU2003 studies. The pooled model of H vs. Re provided a good fit to all of the data but provided a biased estimate of the Oklahoma City model results. The pooled model of H vs. D/W did not provide a good fit, suggesting that the building topographies of the two cities are too different to produce a reasonable comparison. These inter-study comparisons suggest that the relationships may contain underlying site-specific features that would require elucidation prior to generalizing to other urban sites. Overall, results from this work present a foundational method for providing estimates of H based on readily available sources of data. Future work is planned for applying the method to more realistic and reactive ambient pollutants. Other potential applications include development of a module based on the H model to analyze sub-grid scale variability in urban settings within CMAQ or to analyze neighborhood and urban scale spatial variability around central site monitors for use in epidemiological studies. (This presentation does not necessarily reflect the policy of the U.S. EPA.)
Jennifer Richmond-Bryant
|
Kenneth E. Pickering
|
| 2:40 PM |
Naresh Kumar
|
Shao-Hang Chu
|
| 3:00 PM |
Break |
Break |
| 3:30 PM | Town Hall Meeting  CMAQ Adjoint Modeling Group, Chaired by Rob Pinder (US
EPA) and Amir Hakami (Carleton University) Grumman Auditorium |
| 4:15 PM | User's Forum Grumman Auditorium
Theme: How do we further stimulate community participation in model development and evaluation?
- Community needs for specific model features (include the status of Plume-in-grid, source apportionment, etc.)
- Model Evaluation as a community activity
|
| 5:30-7:30 PM | Reception Atrium |
| October 26, 2011 - Grumman Auditorium |
| | Grumman Auditorium |
Redbud Room |
| 7:30 AM | Registration and Continental Breakfast |
| 8:00 AM | A/V Upload for Oral Presenters | A/V Upload for Oral Presenters |
| |
Model Evaluation and Analysis, Chaired by Naresh Kumar (EPRI) and Shawn Roselle (US EPA) |
Policy and Decision Support, Chaired by Greg Yarwood (ENVIRON) and Bryan Hubbell (US EPA) |
| 8:30 AM |
K. Wyat Appel
|
Chris Emery
|
| 8:50 AM |
Impact of lightning-NO on eastern United States photochemistry during the summer of 2006 as determined using the CMAQ model
D. J. Allen1, K. E. Pickering2, R. W. Pinder3, B. H. Henderson4, K. W. Appel3, and A. Prados5
[1]{Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA}
[2]{Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Branch, Code 613.3 NASA-Goddard, Greenbelt, MD, USA}
[3]{Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA}
[4]{University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA}
[5]{Joint Center for Earth Sciences Technology (JCET), University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA}
A lightning-nitrogen oxide (NO) algorithm is developed for the regional Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) and used to evaluate the impact of lightning-NO emissions (LNOx) on tropospheric photochemistry over the eastern United States during the summer of 2006. The scheme assumes flash rates are proportional to the model convective precipitation rate but then adjusts the flash rates locally to match monthly average observations.
Over the eastern United States, LNOxis responsible for 20-25% of the tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) column. This additional NO2reduces the low-bias of simulated NO2columns with respect to satellite-retrieved Dutch Ozone Monitoring Instrument NO2(DOMINO) columns from 41 to 14%. It also adds 10-20 ppbv to upper tropospheric ozone and 1.5-4.5 ppbv to 8-hour maximum surface layer ozone, although, on average, the contribution of LNOxto surface ozone is 1-2 ppbv less on poor air quality days. Biases between modeled and satellite-retrieved tropospheric NO2columns vary greatly between urban and rural locations. In general, CMAQ overestimates columns at urban locations and underestimates columns at rural locations. These biases are consistent with in situ measurements that also indicate that CMAQ has too much NO2in urban regions and not enough in rural regions. However, closer analysis suggests that most of the differences between modeled and satellite-retrieved urban to rural ratios are likely a consequence of the horizontal and vertical smoothing inherent in columns retrieved by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI).
Within CMAQ, LNOxincreases wet deposition of oxidized nitrogen by 50% and total deposition of nitrogen by 11%. This additional deposition reduces the magnitude of the CMAQ low-bias in nitrate wet deposition with respect to National Atmospheric Deposition monitors to near zero.
In order to obtain an upper bound on the contribution of uncertainties in chemistry to upper tropospheric NOxlow biases, sensitivity calculations with updated chemistry were run for the time period of the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX-A) field campaign (summer 2004). After adjusting for possible interferences in NO2measurements and averaging over the entire campaign, these updates reduced 7-9 km biases from 32 to 17% and 9-12 km biases from 57 to 46%. While these changes lead to better agreement, a considerable NO2low-bias remains in the uppermost troposphere.
Dale J. Allen
|
Background Air Quality in the United States Under Current and Future Emissions Scenarios Zachariah Adelman, Meridith Fry, and Jason West
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering
University of North Carolina
Pat Dolwick and Carey Jang
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
United States Environmental Protection Agency
In January 2010, EPA proposed to strengthen the 8-hour primary ozone standard, designed to protect public health, to a level within the range of 0.060-0.070 parts per million (ppm). Attaining ground-level ozone standards at those levels will be made more difficult by recent trends of increasing global background pollution concentrations. Modernizing economies in Asia and a changing climate are interacting to increase the transported and natural background air pollution in the United States. To help understand the challenges that air managers will face, computer models are used to estimate background air pollution concentrations. In this study we performed finite-difference simulations with the MOZART-4 global chemistry transport model to quantify background air quality in the U.S. Using a current year meteorology dataset that was held constant through all simulations, we studied the changes in background U.S. air quality under different emissions scenarios. We used MOZART-4 to simulate global air quality with the IPCC Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) emission inventories for 2005 and 2025 under different greenhouse gas emission control scenarios. Annual MOZART-4 simulations were run both with and without North American anthropogenic emissions to estimate background ozone concentrations for the U.S. under the current and future RCP emissions scenarios. Chemical downscaling of the MOZART-4 simulations to produce boundary conditions for the CMAQ regional chemistry-transport model were also explored in order to study the differences in background estimates produced by global and regional scale chemistry models.
Z. Adelman
|
| 9:10 AM |
Prakash Karamchandani
|
Estimation of unit level marginal abatement cost and emission market modeling; Case study of NOx SIP call sources
S. Morteza Mesbaha, Stephan Schottb, Amir Hakamia
aDepartment of civil and environmental engineering, Carleton University
bDepartment of public policy and administration, Carleton University
Cap-and-trade emission programs have proven to be an effective regulatory tool compared to the traditional command-and-control approach. In cap-and-trade programs, the right to pollute the environment is defined as a property right that can be traded among polluters. The nature of the pollutant, however, affects the design of the program. NOx as one of the precursors of ozone is a non-uniformly mixed pollutant with a short atmospheric lifetime. The ozone formation potential of NOx emissions depends on a number of factors such as location, time of release, and the chemical regime of the trajectory. NOx SIP call trading program (2003 to 2008) caused a significant reduction in total NOx from SIP sources in the US. It was successful in reducing total NOx emissions but may have not optimally reduced ozone as the location-specific ozone formation potentials were neglected. In a previous work, the emission-based cap-and-trade systems (with exchange rate of unity, i.e. all emissions are considered to be of equal importance), and sensitivity-based exchange rates were contrasted. A hypothetical NOx trading program was constructed that could more effectively reduce surface ozone alongside NOx emission reductions (Mesbah et al., CMAS, 2009).
This paper is an extension of the previous work for the SIP call trading sources, with season-long adjoint simulations, CEM-augmented emission inventory for the SIP call, and a new methodology to estimate unit level marginal abatement cost curves for power plants in different locations based on real-life operational data and considering the opportunity cost. A marginal abatement cost curve shows the per-unit emission reduction cost as a function of emission levels. The estimation of marginal abatement cost curves is important since a power plant can use its marginal abatement cost curve information to decide whether it is worthwhile to buy emission permits from other facilities or not. Also, different marginal abatement cost curves change the behavior of the market and its effect on ambient air quality.
The unit level NOx marginal abatement cost is calculated for SIP call sources. The abatement can occur by installation of a control technology or a reduction in electricity generation. Therefore, marginal abatement is the summation of the marginal control technology cost and marginal output reduction cost (opportunity cost). The control technology cost is estimated using The Integrated Planning Model of the US EPA for two common post-combustion control technologies: selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR). To estimate the opportunity cost, regional electricity and fuel price data from CIA and the data of fuel consumption, electricity generation, and NOx emissions from the clean air market are used. Using the estimated unit level marginal abatement costs, different approaches including a) command-and-control, b) trading system with no exchange rate (SIP call trading), and c) trading system with adjoint exchange rates are compared.
Morteza Mesbah
|
| 9:30 AM |
Weekly cycles of observed and modeled NOx and O3 concentrations as a function of land use type and ozone production sensitivity
Yunsoo Choi1,2, Hyuncheol Kim1,2, Daniel Tong1,2, Pius Lee1, Fantine Ngan3, Yunhee Kim1,2, Rick Saylor4, Ariel Stein1,2, Jeff McQueen5, Ivanka Stajner6
1NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD
2Earth Resources Laboratory, Inc
3University of Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
4NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division, Oak Ridge, TN
5NOAA/NWS/National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Spring, MD
6Noblis, Inc., Falls Church, VA
Simulation results from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 4.7 over the Conterminous United States (CONUS) for August 2009 are analyzed to evaluate the daily deviation of observed and modeled ground-level concentrations of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and ozone (O3) at stations classified according to a geographically-based land use designation or a O3-NOx-VOC chemical sensitivity regime. The physical land use designations are derived from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) global land cover characteristic data representing three categories: urban, forest, and other. The O3 sensitivity regimes (NOx-saturated, mixed or NOx-sensitive) are inferred from low to high values of photochemical indicators based on the HCHO to NO2 ratio column data from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment 2 (GOME-2) and model. The weekly cycles of ground level NOx and O3 concentrations from the U. S. EPAs Air Quality System (AQS) and CMAQ are examined over the AVHRR regions and GOME-2 based chemical regimes. Interestingly, the AQS-observed weekly cycles of NOx over the AVHRR urban, other and forest region are similar to those over the GOME-2 NOx-saturated, mixed, and NOx-sensitive regimes, respectively. However, the AQS-observed O3 weekly cycle over the AVHRR urban region is significantly different from that over the GOME-2 NOx-saturated regime. Whereas the weekend high O3 anomaly is clearly shown in both AQS and CMAQ over the NOx-saturated regime, the weekend effect is not captured over the geographically-based urban region, suggesting that the urban region includes other chemical regimes. This study suggests that chemical classification into NOx-saturated, mixed and NOx-sensitive regime stations gives a more accurate picture for the weekly O3 cycles than the geographically-based urban, forest, and other classification.
Yunsoo Choi
|
Matthew Turner
|
| 9:50 AM |
WRF-UCM and CMAQ very high resolution simulations (200 m spatial resolution) over London (UK), Athens (Greece), Gliwice (Poland), Helsinki (Finland) and Florence (Italy): comparison with observational data
Roberto San José1, Juan Luis Pérez1, Enzo Magliulo2 and Nektarios Crysoulakis3
1Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain
2 CNR ISAFoM p.o. box 101 S. Sebastiano (Na) Italy
3Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH) IACM, 100 N. Plastira Str., Vassilika Vouton, P.O. Box 1385, GR-71110, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
A contribution to Session 7 Model evaluation and Analysis
An oral presentation is preferred
WRF and CMAQ models are used in very high spatial resolution (200 m) to simulate urban metabolism (WRF-UCM meteorological fluxes) and air pollution concentrations (CMAQ model). The work was developed into the BRIDGE EU funded project to analyze and study the impact of urban metabolism with different alternatives in urban planning scenarios.
In order to study the urban metabolism (turbulent fluxes) in a very detail way, we decided to use WRF-UCM and CMAQ in a very high resolution mode. However, due to the huge computational time involved in the simulations in order to respect the rate of three between the spatial resolutions up to 200 m, we decided an intermediate configuration approach.
We used the GFS boundary conditions with one degree and an intermediate model domain with 5.4 km spatial resolution with 37 x 37 grid cells over each city and a rate of 27 to go down up to 0.2 km spatial resolution. Urban Canopy Model (UCM) was activated by producing the proper additional landuse types: a) high urban density; b) low urban density and c) commercial / industrial landuse type.
These information was produced from very high spatial resolution landuse and topography files. 3D urban information was available for the cities to produce the average height of the buildings for each of the additional urban landuse types, width of the average canyon street for each of the additional urban landuse types and the average width of the roof for the additional urban landuse types.
The runs show that increase in the high spatial resolution produces a decrease on the quality of the comparison between observational monitoring data and modeling data. In some cases like in London during some specific periods of time the wind speed results and not realistic. However, in general the model when running with very high spatial resolution produces good results although the quality in slightly reduced. Some numerical stability could be involved in the very high spatial resolution runs. CMAQ results show results according to those obtained with WRF-UCM results. CMAQ ozone correlation coefficient in Athens is higher than 0.7 for the whole 2008 year. Correlation coefficients for meteorological variables using WRF-UCM very high resolution are found to be 0.983 for temperature with 200 m spatial resolution in Helsinki, however, sensible heat fluxes are correlated with 0.595 for 200 m spatial resolution. Further investigation related to the behavior of WRF-UCM and CMAQ using very high spatial resolution is needed.
Roberto San Jose
|
Greg Yarwood
|
| 10:10 AM |
Break |
Break |
| 10:40 AM |
Wei Zhou
|
Carey Jang
|
| 11:00 AM |
Comparative analysis of CMAQ simulations of a particulate matter episode over Germany
Volker Matthias(a), Armin Aulinger(a), Markus Quante(a), Charles Chemel(b), Juan L. Perez(c), Roberto San Jose(c), Ranjeet Sokhi(b)
(a) Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute of Coastal Research, Max-Planck-Strasse 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany
(b) University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, United Kingdom
(c) Technical University of Madrid, Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain
An intercomparison of CMAQ model results for a high particulate matter episode in winter 2003 in Germany has been performed. This episode was connected with stagnant conditions under high pressure and low wind speeds. It has already been studied in a first
intercomparison experiment with five different participating model systems (Stern et al., 2008). It was found that most of the model systems significantly underestimated the high PM10 values observed in large parts of Germany.
The aim of this subsequent study was to look in more detail at the different effects that influence the particle concentrations at ground but also in higher altitudes. For this purpose, three European research groups, namely University of Hertfordshire, Technical University of Madrid and Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht (formerly named GKSS Research Center), which all apply the CMAQ model in Europe, took part in the study. It has been undertaken in the framework of COST 728.
The intercomparison was done in three rounds. All groups simulated the concentrations of different aerosol components and their precursors for the 16-days period between 24 February and 11 March 2003.
In the first round all groups used their own setup in terms of meteorological input files, emission preparation, grid spacing, boundary conditions, and computing platforms. Although all groups used CMAQ 4.5 in the same configuration, the results were very diverse.
In the second round, the input fields were exchanged between the groups and the results were reproduced on different high performance computers. The influence of compilers and computing platforms was investigated and found to be rather small.
In the final step, sensitivity runs with different meteorological and emission input fields were performed. Meteorological fields were calculated with both, MM5 and WRF. Additionally, different parameterizations were chosen for MM5. It could be shown that for this period the meteorological fields had the largest impact on the results. The temporal disaggregation of the emission data fields could play an important role for some anthropogenic aerosol components. Nitrate concentrations for example were found to be strongly dependent on ammonia emissions, because in the model ammonium nitrate is only formed if free ammonia is available. Ammonia emissions that vary on a monthly basis only may lead to large steps in nitrate aerosol concentrations connected with drastic increases in ammonia emissions on the first day of a month.
In conclusion it was found that even if well established research groups use the same chemistry transport model in the same configuration the model results for a given period might be very diverse.
Our work showed the importance of the sensitivity of PM concentrations to emissions and meteorological inputs and why models, based on seemingly similar configurations and setup conditions, can lead to differing results. This highlights the need for common approaches and frameworks for applying mesoscale modelling to air pollution problems.
Volker Matthias
|
Kirk Baker
|
| 11:20 AM |
Jaemeen Baek
|
Daven Henze
|
| 11:40 AM |
Manuel Santiago
|
Amanda Pappin
|
| 12:00 PM |
Lunch, Trillium Room |
Lunch, Trillium Room |
| |
Model Evaluation and Analysis, cont. |
Air Quality and Climate Change, Chaired by Kiran Alapaty (US EPA) |
| 1:00 PM |
Fernando Garcia-Menendez
|
Yang Gao
|
| 1:20 PM |
S.L. Napelenok
|
Effects of global change on air quality in the US
Serena H. Chung1, Rodrigo Gonzalez Abraham1, Brian Lamb1, Jeremy Avise2, Eric P. Salathe3, 4Yongxin Zhang, 5David G. Streets, 6Chris Nolte, 6Dan Loughlin, 4Alex Guenther, 4Christine Wiedinmyer, 4Tiffany Duhl
1Washington State University
2California Air Resources Board
3University of Washington
4National Center for Atmospheric Research
5Argonne National Laboratory
6Environmental Protection Agency
As part of an ongoing analysis of the effects of global change on regional air quality in the US, we report results for current and future simulations in terms of the sensitivity of future conditions to changes in meteorology, global anthropogenic emissions (chemical boundary conditions), land use and biogenic emissions, and US anthropogenic emissions. Meteorological fields, downscaled from the results of the ECHAM5 global climate model using WRF, were used to drive the MEGAN biogenic emissions model, the SMOKE emissions processing tool, and the CMAQ chemical transport model for five representative summers within each of the current (1995-2004) and a future decade (2045-2054). CMAQ simulations employed two nested domains covering most of the Northern Hemisphere from eastern Asia to North America at 220-km horizontal resolution (semi-hemispheric domain) and covering the continental US at 36-km resolution (CONUS). For the current decade semi-hemispheric domain simulation, year 2000 global emissions of gases (ozone precursors) from anthropogenic, natural, and biomass burning sources from the POET and EDGAR emission inventories were used. Global emissions inventories for black and organic carbon from Bond et al (2004) were applied. For the future decade semi-hemispheric domain simulations, current decade emissions were projected to the year 2050 following the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) A1B emission scenario. For the CONUS simulations, US anthropogenic emissions for the current decade were based on the 2002 National Emissions Inventory prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency. For the future decade simulation, these emissions were projected to 2050 using growth factors from the U.S. EPA MARKAL nine-region database and energy system model following a scenario that assumes baseline criteria pollutant policies, including the application of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). Results on ozone and PM2.5 concentrations and nitrogen deposition will be presented. Policy-relevant results, such as the relative response factor, policy-relevant background concentration, and critical loads, will be discussed.
Serena H. Chung
|
| 1:40 PM |
Marco A. Rodriguez
|
Robert W. Pinder
|
| 2:00 PM |
Model inter-comparison of CMAQ and CHIMERE in the framework of CALIOPE air quality project
J. M. Baldasanoa,b, M. T. Paya,b, S. Maillera, P. Jiménez-Guerreroc,
aEarth Sciences Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center Centro Nacional de Supercomputación (BSC-CNS). Barcelona, Spain.
bEnvironmental Modelling Laboratory, Technical University of Catalonia. Barcelona, Spain
cPhysics of the Earth, University of Murcia, Spain
The development of comprehensive emission inventories constitutes a fundamental step for the advance in air quality modeling. Great efforts have been made in the last decades in order to improve emissions estimations and quantify the associated uncertainties.
In order to provide emissions as an input to mesoscale air quality models two different approaches are usually followed: top-down or bottom-up methodologies. Top-down emission inventories are derived from global or national estimations of pollutant emissions, then disaggregated spatially and temporary to the resolutions needed to be used by air quality models, e.g. adopting the EMEP inventory for Europe. In bottom-up emission inventories, on the contrary, each activity sector is treated separately with a specific methodology, considering specific emission factors and activity indicators, and emissions are aggregated thereafter, e.g. HERMES (Baldasano et al., 2008) or SMOKE (Houyoux et al., 2000).
Both approaches are compared here by means of the CALIOPE modeling system (Baldasano et al., 2010) for the Iberian Peninsula. WRF-ARWv3.2 (Michalakes et al., 2004; Skamarock and Klemp, 2008) and CMAQv4.7 (Byun and Ching, 1999; Foley et al., 2010) are used together with HERMES and EMEP emission inventories for the 26-28 November, 2008 period, with high spatial resolution, 4x4 km2, and identical setup for initial and boundary conditions. Model performances in terms of NO2 predictions are assessed against EMEP background air quality observations, providing comparable statistical indicators (Mean Normalized Biases and Gross Errors). However, the spatial distribution of emissions plays a fundamental role in final NO2 modeled levels. Simulations performed using EMEP top-down emissions as inputs do not reproduce specific features that are captured when using HERMES bottom-up, such as the dispersion of point source emissions. Variations are observed both in the extent of affected areas and final pollutant levels.
We conclude that the use of bottom-up emissions inventories can provide substantial changes in the derived air quality levels when compared to top-down approaches. Therefore, the increase of resolution in meteorological and chemical transport models must be done together with an accurate spatial allocation of emissions, which can be easily achieved by means of bottom-up approaches.
J.M. Baldasano
|
Tanya Otte
|
| 2:20 PM |
Barron H. Henderson
|
Dr. Marc Carreras-Sospedra
|
| 2:40 PM |
Halil Cakir
|
Yang Gao
|
| 3:00 PM |
Break |
Break |
| |
Model Evaluation and Analysis, cont. |
Air Pollution Meteorology, Chaired by Adel Hanna (UNC) |
| 3:30 PM |
Lakshmi Pradeepa Vennam
|
Aijun Xiu
|
| 3:50 PM |
Heather Simon/Sharon Phillips/Kristen Foley
|
Yun Hee Park
|
| |
Model Evaluation and Analysis, cont. |
Regulatory Modeling and SIP Applications, Chaired by Adel Hanna (UNC) |
| 4:10 PM |
Daiwen Kang
|
Sean Beevers
|
| 4:30 PM |
|
Ying LI
|
|